简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Brokers Expand As Prop Models Shift
Abstract:Retail broker XTB secures regulatory approval to offer gold and crude oil CFDs in Indonesia amid tightening European oversight, while the founder of a prominent retail prop firm exits the forex and futures challenge model due to infrastructure costs.

Retail brokers are securing new Asian regulatory approvals to trade gold and oil contracts, even as the proprietary trading industry faces internal pressure. The divergence in the retail trading sector shows established brokers pushing into emerging markets while smaller prop operators struggle with platform costs. For traders, this highlights a diverging environment where regulated commodity access is expanding while unregulated challenge models pivot to new asset classes.
XTB Secures Indonesian Commodity CFD Approval
On August 20, XTB officially launched commodity contract-for-difference (CFD) trading in Indonesia through its local unit, PT XTB Indonesia Berjangka. The broker secured an Alternative Trading System (SPA) approval from Bappebti, allowing retail clients to trade CFDs on gold, silver, palladium, oil, and natural gas.
The company reported a 741.51% increase in funded accounts in Indonesia for the first half of 2026, justifying the push into a market with a rapidly growing young demographic. This expansion contrasts sharply with its home market in Poland, where the Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) is conducting an open-ended review of retail CFD distribution and recently fined the broker 20 million zlotys over risk disclosure issues. For the broader trading market, the move shows established brokers relying on Asian growth to offset tightening European regulations on leveraged products.
The Funded Trader Founder Exits Prop Industry
In the retail proprietary trading sector, Angelo Ciaramello, founder of The Funded Trader, announced on August 21 the closure of his futures firm Rev One Trading. Rather than a lack of trader demand, Ciaramello blamed the economics of the trading technology stack and the lack of top-tier platform options for scaling the business.
He is exiting the prop firm model entirely to focus on prediction markets. The exit occurs just as technology providers like Match-Trade and PropAccount.com begin integrating event-driven prediction markets alongside traditional forex and futures infrastructure. This transition illustrates the rising technical and margin pressures facing the simulated retail funding model, pushing operators to seek alternative revenue streams outside conventional FX and futures challenges.
What Is Driving It
Two distinct forces are driving these shifts in retail market structure. First, regulatory arbitrage is pushing established brokers to seek volume in Southeast Asia. As European regulators scrutinize how leveraged instruments are sold to retail clients, brokers are deploying capital into markets with clear derivative frameworks and expanding user bases. Second, rising infrastructure costs are squeezing the retail prop firm sector. Platform limitations and the cost of scaling simulated trading environments are forcing some operators to abandon the traditional forex and futures challenge model in favor of emerging event contracts.
Why It Matters
These developments reveal a fracturing in the retail trading environment. Regulated brokers are successfully cementing their presence in high-growth regions by offering direct access to highly traded macro assets like gold and crude oil. Meanwhile, the unregulated proprietary trading sector is showing signs of structural strain. Traders currently face a market where traditional brokerage access to core commodities is improving, but the simulated funding models they rely on for leverage are facing severe technical and economic limitations.


Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.










