Global Broker Regulation Inquiry App
About WikiFX
  • Follow
  • For You
  • Updates
  • Business
avatarAddress
FX8055531322

Exposure Severe slippage, customer service unresponsive, losses borne entirely by the investor.

Severe slippage, customer service unresponsive, losses borne entirely by the investor. Don't trade with this platform anymore, it's a total rip-off.
04-29
2
27
64
avatarAddress
115641

Exposure Deposit not credited

Hello, I deposited money into the platform EE TRADE at 11:48 AM on June 29th, but it hasn't arrived in my account after an hour. I contacted customer service to ask what was going on. They asked me to provide proof of deposit, which I submitted. They then told me to keep waiting. After I asked a few more questions, they hung up on me, and the money still hasn't arrived.
06-29
6
6
avatarAddress
五一咯

Exposure Never use this kind of platform; you won't be able to withdraw your funds.

Never use this kind of platform. Not only will you be unable to withdraw your money, but they can also make your account inaccessible. These platforms have extremely high authority; once you deposit your money, you'll be unable to find them.
06-10
8
8
avatarAddress
Ahmad Fshafsha

Exposure I had traded with JustMarkets

I had traded with JustMarkets before with smaller amounts and everything was fine. So I trusted them with a bigger deposit of $10,000 via crypto. I grew the account to $107,000 in legitimate trading. The moment I submitted a withdrawal request in September 2024, they immediately blocked my account with no warning and no explanation. For weeks they kept asking for documents. Binance statements — rejected. Screen recordings — rejected. Selfie with ID — rejected. Every time I sent exactly what they asked for, they rejected it and asked for something else. It never ended. Then 26 days after blocking my account, they accused me of fraud. No specific act mentioned. No evidence provided. Ever. They returned my $10,000 deposit but kept my $97,000 in profits. I formally complained and their official response was: the company reserves the right not to disclose internal details or evidence. So they accuse me of fraud but will not show a single piece of evidence — not to me, not to the regulator.
05-20
5
2
avatarAddress
永恒号

Exposure Pepperstone is a self-proclaimed, large-scale, yet unethical platform.

Pepperstone, a self-proclaimed top-tier platform, is a shady operation. At crucial moments, their deposit and withdrawal channels become problematic, whether intentionally or not. They seem to be deliberately designed to cause losses for clients, involving the transfer of funds to illicit accounts, freezing my bank card, and then being pressured into signing guarantees by a man in a hat. I tolerated all of that, but in the end, they refused to compensate me for my losses. After that, they stopped replying to my emails and refused to communicate, only responding with automated, official replies from a chatbot. I urge everyone to be vigilant and hope the platform can help me recover my $22,700 loss.
06-03
1
12
11
avatarAddress
A-合美男士·阿斌(提前预约)

Exposure Manipulating the K-line chart at 6 AM

Manipulating the K-line chart at 6 AM: No platform saw a $30 drop at 6 AM opening, but only the Upway platform experienced a drop.
05-12
1
10
25
avatarAddress
FX2196527519

Exposure Withdrawal request denied

This platform is so shady—they rejected my withdrawal request even though I made a profit. Are they completely out of control?
02-22
2
35
11
avatarAddress
WikiFX News

RBI's $40.82 Billion Forex Surge: A Bigger Rupee Shield—or Just Borrowed Time?

In less than two months, a policy window that sounded technical has pulled in more foreign currency than Indias celebrated 2013 FCNR(B) programme. The confirmed total is now $40.82 billion. That is a meaningful buffer for the balance of payments—but it is not a blank cheque for a stronger rupee.Key Points  Confirmed update: RBI-linked concessional swap facilities had mobilised $40.82 billion by 31 July 2026. FCNR(B) deposits contributed $36.725 billion, OFCBs $2.575 billion and ECBs $1.520 billion. These are reported actual inflows based on data from authorised dealer banks.  What is not confirmed: The $80–85 billion figure is an SBI Research projection for potential mobilisation by the end of the relevant windows. It is not RBI guidance, a target achieved, or a guaranteed final total.Why the latest number has global attention  On 1 August, The Hindu reported that the RBI facility had attracted $40.82 billion by the end of July. KNN India published the component breakdown: $36.725 billion through Foreign Currency Non-Resident (Bank) deposits, $2.575 billion through Overseas Foreign Currency Borrowings, and $1.520 billion through External Commercial Borrowings.  The speed is striking. Akashvani reported $20.718 billion of total inflows by 17 July. Roughly two weeks later, the figure was almost double. That acceleration explains why the RBI forex swap facility is drawing attention from banks, NRI depositors, corporate treasurers and traders watching USD/INR.  It also updates an earlier market snapshot. The Indian Express reported about $32 billion across the measures on 27 July. The new $40.82 billion figure is therefore not a competing claim. It is a later cut-off date with a larger confirmed total.Four figures, four different meaningsFigureDate/statusWhat it measuresEditorial treatment$17.406BActual at 17 JulyFCNR(B) deposits onlyConfirmed, but not the total across all channels.$20.718BActual at 17 JulyFCNR(B) + OFCB + ECBConfirmed total for that cut-off date.~$32BReported 27 JulyBroader mobilisation under RBI-linked measuresA dated actual update; methodology should be stated.$40.82BActual at 31 JulyFCNR(B) + OFCB + ECBLatest confirmed total used in this article.$80–85BSBI Research projectionPossible final mobilisationForecast only; never present as achieved or guaranteed.     Key takeaway: The latest milestone is $40.82 billion of actual mobilisation. The higher $80–85 billion range belongs in a scenario discussion, not in a sentence describing money already received.    Figure 1. The 31 July figure is confirmed actual mobilisation; the $80–85 billion range remains a projection.How the swap window works  RBI announced the measures on 5 June and operationalised them on 8 June. For eligible fresh FCNR(B) deposits, banks can swap the foreign currency with the central bank on concessional terms. This reduces or removes part of the hedging burden that would otherwise make long-dated foreign-currency deposits expensive to mobilise.  The programme also covers eligible OFCB and ECB flows. The original operational details reported by Reuters show that the policy was designed to strengthen the balance of payments and improve access to foreign currency during a period of pressure on the rupee and the external account.  The deadlines are not identical. The FCNR(B) deposit window remains available until 30 September 2026, while OFCB and ECB channels run until 31 December 2026. That difference matters when comparing forecasts, because a projected final total may assume several more months of borrowing-channel inflows after the deposit window closes.The 2013 comparison: useful, but not identical  The obvious historical reference is 2013, when the taper tantrum triggered capital outflows and a sharp fall in the Indian rupee. RBIs own retrospective says the 2013 FCNR(B) and overseas-borrowing windows mobilised about $34 billion. The 2026 programme has already moved beyond that amount in less than two months.  The comparison is impressive, but it should not become a slogan. The global rate environment, oil shock, starting level of reserves, banking balance sheets and exchange-rate regime are different. The relevant lesson is that subsidised hedging can mobilise dollars quickly. It does not prove that the same policy will produce the same market outcome.  Other emerging economies also mobilise foreign currency through diaspora deposits, sovereign bonds or special remittance accounts. Those tools can diversify funding, but they usually create interest, rollover or currency-management obligations. A country receives liquidity today and accepts a future repayment or swap obligation. That trade-off is why the phrase free dollars is misleading.Why $40.82 billion does not guarantee a stronger rupee  More foreign-currency supply can reduce immediate pressure in the spot and forward markets. It can also improve confidence that banks and the central bank have access to dollars. However, USD/INR still responds to oil prices, the broad US dollar, portfolio flows, importer demand, government borrowing, and the RBIs own intervention choices.  Indias oil bill is especially important. A rise in crude prices increases the dollars required by refiners and importers. That demand can absorb part of the supply created by the swap window. Likewise, foreign portfolio selling can outweigh deposit inflows during a risk-off episode. A large headline number is a buffer, not a force field.  The maturity profile also matters. FCNR(B) deposits and external borrowings eventually mature. If the money is rolled over smoothly, the impact can be manageable. If global funding conditions tighten near maturity, refinancing becomes more expensive. That risk is not an argument against the programme. It is a reason to examine the liabilities as carefully as the initial inflow.Who gains—and what they still need to manageParticipantPossible benefitRisk still presentNRI depositorPotentially attractive foreign-currency deposit termsBank credit, tax, tenor and reinvestment conditions.Indian bankCheaper or more predictable hedging for eligible inflowsAsset-liability matching and future rollover.ImporterBetter dollar liquidity can reduce disorderly movesOil prices and corporate dollar demand can still lift USD/INR.ExporterA more stable currency improves planningAn unexpectedly stronger rupee can reduce translated revenue.Institutional investorStronger external buffer can improve confidenceMarket pricing still depends on rates, growth and global risk.     Illustrative scenario—not a real investor case: An Indian importer must pay $5 million in six weeks. The $40.82 billion programme may improve market liquidity, but it does not fix the importers future exchange rate. A treasury team would still compare forward cover, option costs, cash-flow tolerance and the risk of leaving the exposure open.Common misconceptions  Misconception 1: $40.82 billion has permanently entered RBIs usable reserves. The scheme involves swaps and liabilities; headline mobilisation is not identical to unrestricted, permanent reserve accumulation.  Misconception 2: The rupee must strengthen by a predictable amount. Exchange rates reflect many simultaneous flows, and RBI may prioritise orderly movement over a specific level.  Misconception 3: $80–85 billion is the next confirmed milestone. It is a research projection that depends on deposit mobilisation, bank participation and the remaining policy windows.What to watch next  The next useful update is not merely another headline total. Watch the share of FCNR(B) deposits versus borrowings, the pace of mobilisation before 30 September, and whether banks are competing aggressively on deposit rates. Those details reveal the cost and durability of the inflows.  For the Indian
08-03
4
1
avatarAddress
avatarFrame
FX3964667865

Exposure The EE TRADE software platform has been refusing to allow withdrawals.

I downloaded the EE TRADE app on March 5th and deposited money twice. I traded day and night, winning tens of thousands of USDT. I then applied for a withdrawal, but the platform wouldn't process it, saying it needed to be reviewed. Then, at 5 AM on March 30th, the platform automatically transferred all my tens of thousands of USDT, and it was still in my USDT wallet. I have screenshots as proof. They only allow withdrawals when I lose, but refuse to let me withdraw when I win.
05-05
2
21
18
avatarAddress
FX2589924867

Exposure g4trade not accept withdraw

I trade normal and profit but g4trade not accept withdraw, i withdraw 27/05/2026. today not accept
06-04
2
9
3
Load More
Select Country/Region
United States
※ WikiFX compiles data from publicly available sources and user contributions. While we endeavor to maintain its accuracy, we do not warrant the information's completeness, accuracy, or timeliness, as it may become outdated. Investors are strongly advised to verify critical details with official sources before making any decisions.
You are visiting the WikiFX website. WikiFX Internet and its mobile products are an enterprise information searching tool for global users. When using WikiFX products, users should consciously abide by the relevant laws and regulations of the country and region where they are located.
consumer hotline:006531290538
Official Email:support@wikifx.com;
Mobile Phone Number:234 706 777 7762;61 449895363
Telegram:+60 103342306
Whatsapp:+852-6613 1970;
License or other information error corrections, please send the information to:qa@wikifx.com
Cooperation:business@wikifx.com