Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Singapore authorities have concluded a major anti-scam enforcement operation that resulted in 221 individuals being placed under investigation for their alleged roles in a wide range of fraudulent schemes.

Singapore authorities have concluded a major anti-scam enforcement operation that resulted in 221 individuals being placed under investigation for their alleged roles in a wide range of fraudulent schemes. The operation ran from 21 May to 3 June 2026, and police confirmed that the suspects are linked to more than 658 reported scam cases in which victims collectively lost in excess of S$9 million (about RM28 million).
The suspects range in age from 15 to 81 years old, comprising 149 men and 72 women. They are being investigated for alleged involvement either as active scammers or as money mules, the individuals who facilitate the movement of illegal funds through their bank accounts. The offences being investigated include cheating, money laundering, and providing payment services without a valid licence.
The bulk of cases uncovered during the operation involved some of the most common forms of scam activity seen across Southeast Asia today, including e-commerce fraud, friend impersonation scams, job scams, government official impersonation, investment fraud, and rental scams. The breadth of these categories reflects how extensively scam syndicates have diversified their approaches to target="_blank" kwlink="6384064000816950219725">target different segments of the population.
Penalties for those found guilty are severe. Convictions for cheating
carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine. Money laundering offences can result in imprisonment of up to 10 years, a fine of up to S$500,000, or both. Individuals convicted of offering payment services without a licence face up to three years in prison and fines reaching S$125,000.
Singapore has also recently toughened its stance on scam involvement at the legislative level. Since 30 December 2025, those convicted of direct scam activity now face mandatory caning of between six and 24 strokes. Money mules who assist syndicates by laundering proceeds, supplying SIM cards, or providing Singpass credentials are subject to discretionary caning of up to 12 strokes.
Beyond criminal prosecution, individuals connected to these offences, whether under investigation, previously warned, or already convicted, may face restrictions on their banking services and mobile line subscriptions. Police reiterated that anyone with information relating to scam activity is encouraged to contact the police hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit a tip online through the official police portal. All information submitted will be treated confidentially.


Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.