Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:If you are considering depositing money with SOUQ CAPITAL, you are right to be doing your research first. Safety is the most important factor in trading, not just profit potential.

If you are considering depositing money with SOUQ CAPITAL, you are right to be doing your research first. Safety is the most important factor in trading, not just profit potential.
According to WikiFX data, SOUQ CAPITAL has a Safety Score of 1.81 out of 10. This is considered a low score and indicates a high-risk environment. The firm was established very recently in 2024 and is registered in Saint Lucia.
Here is what the data reveals about their safety, fees, and reliability.
The Evidence:
According to the regulatory database, SOUQ CAPITAL currently holds no valid regulatory license. While they are registered in Saint Lucia, there is no evidence of authorization from a major financial regulator (like the FCA, ASIC, or CYSEC).
The Verdict:
No. Based on the lack of regulation, your funds are at high risk.
What this means for you:
When a broker is Unregulated, it means they are operating without a “referee.”
The Evidence:
SOUQ CAPITAL offers a maximum leverage of 1:500. For their “Classic” account, spreads start from 1.2 pips, and for the “Premier” account, spreads start from 0.0 pips.
The Implications:
The Evidence:
We checked the WikiFX database and found 0 confirmed complaints against SOUQ CAPITAL so far.
What this really means:
Do not confuse “No complaints” with “Safe.”
SOUQ CAPITAL was established in 2024. Because they are so new, they likely haven't had enough clients or been in business long enough to generate negative feedback yet. In the world of online trading, a “clean sheet” on a brand-new broker is common, but the low safety score (1.81) and lack of regulation are much louder warning signs than the lack of complaints.
The Evidence:
Data shows that SOUQ CAPITAL provides the MT5 (MetaTrader 5) platform, as well as a proprietary (self-developed) mobile app.
The Assessment:
Based on the data, SOUQ CAPITAL has a WikiFX Score of 1.81, is unregulated, and was only established in 2024.
Recommendation:Use Extreme Caution.
The combination of being unregulated plus being a brand-new entity presents a significant risk to your capital. There are no guarantees that your funds are segregated or safe. Most experts recommend choosing a broker with at least 5 years of history and a Tier-1 license (like the FCA or ASIC).
Brokers change their terms often. Before you click 'Deposit', take 5 seconds to verify their live status and latest certificate on the WikiFX App.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.