Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The FCA warns of a "clone" broker impersonating Fortrade. Discover how to spot the scam and protect your funds with WikiFX.

The UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has sounded the alarm regarding a sophisticated new scam targeting retail traders. In a warning issued on November 26, the regulator identified a fraudulent entity posing as the authorized broker target="_blank" kwlink="6384064000816950219725">target="_blank" kwlink="6384064001486563332415">Fortrade, attempting to dupe investors by hijacking the legitimate firm's brand and license details.
This tactic, known in the industry as a “clone firm,” involves fraudsters using the name, firm reference number (FRN), and address of a genuine, authorized company to convince victims that they are dealing with a lawful business.
According to the FCAs latest data, the new imposter is operating primarily through the domain fortradevip.com.
While the genuine Fortrade Limited is fully authorized to operate in the UK (FRN: 609970), this clone entity has no association with the regulated firm. The scammers are utilizing a complex network of web addresses to facilitate their trades, including pc.fortradevip.cc and pc.foutriaedus.cc. They have also been contacting potential victims via the email support@fortradevip.cc.

The clone firm appears to be using aggressive marketing tactics to lure in unsuspecting traders. Reports indicate the scammers are pitching “zero spreads” as a primary selling point—a common hook used by unregulated entities to promise unrealistic trading conditions.
Furthermore, the imposters have attempted to build a façade of global legitimacy by claiming false regulatory status. Investigations have revealed that the clone claims to hold licenses in the United States and the Seychelles. However, these claims crumble under scrutiny:
This is not the first time the Fortrade brand has been targeted by identity thieves. The FCAs recent warning serves as a reminder of a persistent threat pattern.
Back in May 2022, the regulator flagged a different iteration of this scam operating under the name “Fortrades Ltd”. At that time, fraudsters utilized the domain fortradesltd.com and even created YouTube content to promote their fake services.
The recurrence of these clones suggests that scammers view the Fortrade brand as a lucrative target, likely due to its established reputation, making it all the more vital for traders to be vigilant.
Distinguishing between a sophisticated clone and a legitimate broker is becoming increasingly difficult for the average investor. To navigate this risk, experts recommend utilizing WikiFX as a primary verification tool.
By simply searching for a broker's name on the WikiFX App, users can instantly access its comprehensive regulatory profile and confirm the authentic, official website URL. Before engaging with any platform, a quick cross-reference on WikiFX provides the definitive proof needed to avoid falling victim to identity theft scams.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.