Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has raised the alarm over a surge in impersonation scams, with close to 500 people losing money in the first half of 2025.

Between January and June, the FCA recorded 4,465 reports of fraudsters misusing its name to deceive consumers. Out of these, 480 victims transferred funds directly to criminals. Older investors appear to be the primary targets, with those aged over 56 accounting for nearly two-thirds of the reports.
The scams often arrive via phone calls, emails, text messages, or WhatsApp, with fraudsters claiming to represent the FCA. They then request payments or sensitive banking details under the pretense of recovering lost investments.
The most common approach involves convincing victims that the FCA has retrieved cryptocurrency allegedly linked to their identities. To access these funds, victims are asked to provide bank information or make additional transfers.
Other schemes involve contacting people who already lost money in fraudulent loans, offering “recovery assistance” for a fee, or sending fake legal notices claiming consumers owe money and must pay the FCA directly.
A particularly harmful trend is so-called “pig butchering” scams, where fraudsters build personal or romantic connections before luring victims into fraudulent investments. After the initial loss, the same criminals return posing as FCA officials offering to help recover funds—again, in exchange for money.
The regulator noted that in 2024 it received 10,379 impersonation scam reports, with 991 victims losing funds. If the current pace continues, 2025 could see another year of sharp increases in financial harm caused by impersonators.
The FCA has made it clear that it will never request money transfers or ask for sensitive banking information such as PINs and passwords. Any message or call making such claims should raise immediate suspicion.
To stay protected, investors are advised to verify the legitimacy of financial service providers through official channels. One effective way is to use platforms like WikiFX, which allow users to check whether a broker is properly licensed and supervised. This extra step of verification can help prevent falling victim to scams that misuse the names of regulators or established institutions.
By combining caution, direct checks with regulators, and tools like WikiFXs broker search, investors can significantly reduce their exposure to fraudsters who exploit trust to steal funds.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.