Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:A new report by ESMA reveals that national regulators across the EU issued more than 970 sanctions totaling €71 million in 2024. While market abuse and MiFID II violations dominated the fines, the agency highlighted the fragmented enforcement landscape across member states.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its first consolidated enforcement report, revealing that financial regulators across the European Union imposed over 970 sanctions in 2024, amounting to more than €71 million in fines. The penalties were mainly for violations under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II).
The report, which covers enforcement actions from all 27 EU member states, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, highlights significant disparities in enforcement approaches. While some national competent authorities (NCAs) favor administrative fines, others rely on warnings or business restrictions.
“The report highlighted the need for greater convergence in sanctioning by NCAs,” ESMA stated, pointing to the lack of consistency in how financial misconduct is punished across the bloc.
Among the national regulators, Cyprus CySEC stood out by conducting over 850 audits, issuing €2.76 million in fines, and withdrawing several licenses. This signals a continued focus on investor protection and regulatory tightening.
In addition to compiling the data, ESMA took direct enforcement action last year, including sanctions against Scope Ratings GmbH for conflicts of interest and the withdrawal of licenses from several data and rating agencies.
The publication comes alongside ESMAs broader strategic objectives. In 2024, ESMA pushed forward reforms such as T+1 settlement cycle work, crypto-asset regulatory frameworks, ESG term usage in fund names, and the launch of the European Single Access Point (ESAP), expected to go live in 2026.
Looking ahead, ESMA will begin supervising ESG rating providers and EU green bond verifiers, further expanding its role as the EUs central market watchdog.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.