Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The UK FCA has issued fresh warnings against multiple clone and unlicensed investment firms impersonating authorized entities to deceive investors. Protect your funds—always verify before investing.

The UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently issued a new batch of warnings targeting clone firms and unauthorized investment platforms operating without regulatory approval. The regulator highlighted multiple cases where scammers impersonate licensed entities or fabricate legitimacy using misleading information.
Among the flagged entities is XY Miners, a fraudulent firm posing as Entre-Wealth Limited. The scam operation used a similar name and fake websites (such as xyminers.com) to deceive investors. However, the genuine Entre-Wealth Limited is fully authorized and has no connection with this scheme.
Another example is capitalgeneration.cc, which falsely claimed ties to the reputable Capital Generation Partners LLP. The clone firm operated through deceptive email domains and websites, attempting to trick unsuspecting investors by mimicking official contact details.
The FCA also warned against:
Each of these clone firms utilizes forged or recycled contact information, sometimes blending in authentic FCA firm reference numbers or addresses to build trust.
In addition to the clone warnings, the FCA listed several entities offering investment services without proper licensing. These include:
These firms are not authorized to provide financial services in the UK. Engaging with them places investors at high risk, as they are not covered by any regulatory protections such as the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) or the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).
The FCA reiterates that investors should always verify a firms regulatory status through the FCA Register. Clone firms often mimic legitimate businesses, but operate with fraudulent intent—sometimes even recycling branding, employee names, or website templates.
If you are approached by someone claiming to represent a licensed firm, always contact the firm directly using contact details listed on the official FCA website, not those provided by the suspicious party.
As investment scams grow more sophisticated, due diligence remains crucial. The FCA‘s latest crackdown reflects the growing need for awareness and self-protection in today’s digital financial environment.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.